by Sheila Connolly
Recently I
read that New York City will be changing the font on its street signs from
Highway Gothic (which it has used since the beginning of city highways) to
something called Clearview.
Per
Wikipedia, "The FHWA Series fonts
(often informally referred to as Highway
Gothic) are a set of sans-serif typefaces developed by the United States Federal
Highway Administration and
used for road signage in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Australia, Spain, Venezuela,
the Netherlands, Brazil, Argentina, Taiwan, Malaysia, Indonesia
and New Zealand. The fonts were created to maximize
legibility at a distance and at high speed."
New York
chose to use the font in all-caps mode (sometimes considered
"shouting" in Internet parlance).
Now there is a federal mandate that requires that those signs in all
capital letters must be replaced with mixed case (upper and lower) signage.
When
Highway Gothic was first used, there was no formal testing of the readability
of fonts. At least there was a
consistency to the appearance of road signs, not only locally but also nationally.
But now
science has caught up with fonts, and early researchers found that Clearview is
16 per cent easier to read than Highway Gothic. If you're going sixty on a highway, you'd have an extra 1-2 seconds to
respond, or a few hundred feet. Clearview may have less personality, but it's more legible, particularly
from a distance.
The old (left) and the new (right) |
Would that
publishers would think the same way. Certainly
publishers have used a variety of fonts over the years. I've always enjoyed the
little notes on the front or back pages saying that a book was printed in
Boldoni Bold or some such, even while not knowing what the heck they were
talking about. At least the publisher was proud of its choice. But by and
large, these days mass market paperbacks are published in something that looks
pretty much like good old Times New Roman. This is not necessarily a bad thing, because it means that to an average
reader, it simply looks like "book" font. They don't have to think about it.
But there's
another twist (and please, editors and publishers, tell me if I'm wrong). Mass market books, at least those from
Berkley, are issued in a standard size and page length (check any Amazon
listing)—304 pages (it was 288 pages for a long time). This is because that size fits neatly, 48 to
a box, and all boxes are the same size.
Now, the
standard word count for my type of paperback—cozies—is anywhere between 65,000
and 80,000 words. This is a pretty wide
range. If you write long, as I sometimes
do (topping out at 84,000 words), does the publisher change the page
count?
No. They change the font size and/or the line
spacing, making it a bit harder to read. Now consider that most of our readers are women of middle-age or beyond,
who may be having problems with aging eyes, and you wonder why the publisher is
sacrificing ease of reading for shipping convenience. Or driving readers to e-readers where the
owner can adjust the font size onscreen.
Who wins?
1 comment:
It's counterproductive for a publisher to make a book harder to read -- yet they seem to do it all the time. Ugly fonts on covers are also counterproductive, but I see a lot of them, including the fonts on my own books. I also see inappropriate fonts, such as fancy script on a horror novel. Alas, writers have no control. This is one reason why so many traditionally published authors say they love the creative freedom of self-publishing.
Post a Comment