Monday, June 1, 2009

Rethinking Charlie Brown in an Existential Age

by Julia Buckley
Now that I teach existential literature, I have a whole different interpretation of my childhood favorites, the Peanuts gang. My adult understanding of the cartoon is that Charles M. Schultz was a philosopher, and that he suffered from the same existential torment as has any hero from literature.

You know all the old Charlie Brown cartoons where Lucy tries to get C.B. to kick the football? He goes through agony trying to decide if Lucy is sincere this time--if he can trust her to leave the ball there so that he can experience one glorious kick.

Lucy always wants Charlie Brown to try, but she never allows him satisfaction. She pulls the ball away and Charlie Brown falls flat on his back--time after time.

I always found this scene odd for several reasons. For one, Lucy is never malicious. Her face is blank when she pulls away the football. The suggestion seems to be that Lucy, like the snake or the scorpion, is merely doing what is in her nature. She has to pull the ball away, because she needs to see people like Charlie Brown try and fail. She doesn't even take smug satisfaction in Charlie Brown's fall; she speaks to him calmly and walks away. For Lucy, the meaning of the universe is verified every time Charlie Brown makes his sad attempt.

For another, Charlie Brown knows what Lucy is. It isn't a matter of wondering whether or not he can trust her--he knows he cannot. Therefore, there must be something else compelling Charlie Brown to agonize over the "to kick or not to kick" decision. He is Hamlet on the ball field, and Lucy is his existential agony. For Charlie Brown, it probably doesn't matter either way. If he kicks it, he could fail. Since he is Charlie Brown, and has very little self-confidence, he most likely will fail. If she pulls it away, there is an excuse for his failure. Lucy is responsible.

Does this mean, then, that Charlie Brown NEEDS Lucy to pull the ball away, because it justifies his lack of prowess? And does Lucy, who dispenses "Psychiatric Help" for five cents a session, somehow understand this?

I often think that Lucy is too easily dismissed as a horrible person. Sure, she is a cartoon, but I find a great deal of existential truth in Charlie Brown.

The Existential Pumpkin Patch

Now on to Linus Van Pelt, one of my favorite cartoon characters; perhaps his greatest moments were those when he was anticipating the arrival of THE GREAT PUMPKIN. Not only is Linus one of the most appealing creations in all of fiction, but his simple belief in the Great Pumpkin, who would preside over the "most sincere" Pumpkin Patch on Halloween night, was the crux of the story. Linus represented the optimism that Charlie Brown could never quite muster, and there is beauty in all of Linus's speeches that are meant to make Charlie Brown take heart.

These boys are the Didi and Gogo of cartoon world, the little philosophers who show us the distance between hope and despair. Schultz's great success, I think, lay in the fact that he never condescended with his characters. The Peanuts gang spoke with wisdom, even world-weariness, and they were appealing to all ages.

When the Great Pumpkin never appears (except in the disillusioning form of Snoopy), Linus is dejected, but it is not long before he is planning for the next Halloween, and a more gloriously sincere pumpkin patch. Linus avoids the abyss because he clings to hope; Charlie Brown has been to the abyss, which is why he seeks pyschiatric help from Lucy, who doles out not Prozac, but common sense.

The heroism of the cartoon boys is similar to that of the men who wait for Godot; they may not always have the answers, but there is always hope, there is always tomorrow. Charlie Brown might actually get mail, and Linus might see something magical.


Elizabeth Spann Craig said...

I absolutely love this post and will be tweeting it. I'm a real fan of Charlie Brown and love your analysis.

I also love that Snoopy perseveres in his writing career, despite the rejections and negative critiques of (mostly) Lucy.

Mystery Writing is Murder

Julia Buckley said...

Yea! I'm going to be Tweeted! :)

Please excuse the comment above yours--I can't seem to delete it.

kk said...

Nice blog - came over here from the list of 7 lady writers - even though I am a guy, I am a fan of Sue Grafton, unlike in the so-called golden age, she sets up psychologically true puzzles - why is this boy being so nice to his dead gf's family? The realization when it comes makes so much sense. :)


Because he feels guilt over her so called accidental death. Of course!

Julia Buckley said...

I enjoy Sue Grafton's books also.

Sandra Parshall said...

I wonder if the creator of Peanuts thought all those situations through. I do sometimes have the feeling he was chuckling as he presented a rather warped view of life in the deceptively comforting form of a comic strip.

Anonymous said...

Need a little extra help figuring out how to do something in Paint - Shop
Pro. The most important thing you must consider prior to getting yourself inked
along with any kind of back skin image, is to seek the help of the expert skin image artist.
Both of these design elements were taken from Gothic dingbats, which were then resized to fit the page.

My web site: neat Tattoo Designs